So we all heard by now that Yahoo is set to unveil a new
logo this September 4th. Companies do this all the time for multiple reasons, usually to stay modern or represent a change. Does it change public perception on the company
then and now?
I listed a few notable companies that underwent massive
logo changes in an effort to revitalize their look and for what reasons why.
Microsoft
Microsoft turned heads in 2012 when they unveiled a fresh
new logo, the first in 25 years.
The goal of the new look was to reflect their metro (now
known as modern) interface that was going to be their universal design language
for all their products (from Windows to phones to even the Xbox).
How did it fare though? Unfortunately for Microsoft Windows
8, Windows Surface and Windows Phone all turned out to be duds with only the
Xbox being successful (and the Xbox One announcement garnered a lot of
criticism). Now their sleek, clean logo is a reflection upon those failures.
It was a good logo that got across that they are committed
to the Modern UI language but now it’s a painful reminder of Microsoft’s
shortcomings.
BP Oil
Early in 2001 BP changed their logo followed by a $200
Million marketing campaign to represent their ability to give us something “beyond
petroleum”.
For an oil company choosing bright green and yellow colors in the
form of a sunflower was an ingenious way of suggesting they would have a
smaller footprint.
Ironically the bright and pretty sunflower has been “tainted”
(pun fully intended) with the infamous BP Oil Spill in 2010. The very logo that
represented a more eco-friendly company was swiftly attacked by the internet
after the spill and the new image of BP is this:
Hundreds of variations of this logo can be found by a quick
Google search, there was even a movement in the UK called Rebrand
(trash) BP's Logo.
Pepsi-Cola
In 2008 Pespi updated their new logo because…well…no one really knows why.
Unlike Microsoft which laid all their eggs on the Modern
Interface and BP which gave the illusion of a smaller carbon footprint, Pepsi
spent a whopping 1 million USD on the new logo and millions more (some numbers
claiming an upwards of 1 billion) in updating all their products to their new
logo.
The design of the new logo was to be asymmetrical for a
simple, playful and edgy look all rolled into one but was it really necessary?
Especially at that price it seems like a logo update wasn't really needed nor
will really have a lasting appeal with customers.
It’s not an image that really has an impactful meaning and
the company was in no way a slouch in the previous year’s either, it’s one of
those cases where it doesn’t really do anything.
Gap
Pepsi’s logo might have been uninteresting and unnecessary
but at least it remained true to form. Gap took an extremely iconic and popular
logo and chose uninspired, boring Sans Serif font and put a tiny blue box behind the
P.
Why isn’t this logo on stores? That’s because it had a short
lifespan. 1 week to be exact.
The logo was so despised and caused such backlash from
customers that after 1 week of announcing the change Gap revealed that it
cancelled this new logo and decided to stay with the old one.
Not only was it unnecessary (like Pepsi’s) but it actually
gave a negative perception of the company, the opposite of what re-branding
tries to do.
Conclusion
Logos change all the time, some of them are hardly
noticeable (Apple and Google) and others are a complete change (BP). When your
re-branding something especially for a large, multi-billion dollar corporation with
decades of history and millions of customers a re-branding has to make sense.
If your company is in good health, has good public
perception and has no change in management then a radical re-branding of your
image can only hurt you in the end. I’m not one to bring up tired and old
examples but Coca-Colas “Coke II” re-branding is still being taught in marketing
classes today.
So where does that leave Yahoo? All we know is that it will
retain its iconic purple font, exclamation point and yodel which is a great
start but it remains to be seen what the final design will look like.
Considering the company has been through rough times and has
recently acquired a new CEO that plans on shaking things up, a rebranding may
be the perfect start to change public perception.





No comments:
Post a Comment